Search


Advanced Search
   About RyersOnline   |  The Ryersonian
Categories
 »  Home  »  Features  »  Going Green  »  Wendy Mesley vs. cancer
Wendy Mesley vs. cancer
By Sarah Petrescu | Published  04/12/2006 | Going Green , Media , Print
Wendy Mesley vs. cancer

It was one startling fact that led Wendy Mesley to investigate the cause of rising cancer rates last year—and all in the midst of her own breast cancer treatments.

“When I found out a child born today has a one in two chance of getting cancer I was shocked,” says Mesley, a former Ryerson journalism student in the 1970s and the current host of CBC’s Marketplace.

“I thought, “That’s really whacked. Why aren’t we doing anything about it,” she says.

Mesley took action.

In her CBC Marketplace documentary Chasing the Cancer Answer, Mesley uses her personal experience as a cancer survivor and skills as a journalist to investigate what’s causing such high cancer rates and why there is so little action taken to prevent the disease.

“Shit happens, people get cancer. But I knew I needed to go out there and confront this as someone who’d been affected. It was important to the story,” says Mesley.

In the documentary, Mesley blasts blaming patients’ lifestyles for their cancer.


Wendy MesleyPhoto courtesy of CBC Television

CBC broadcaster Wendy Mesley.

“I’ve always been a health nut and I got cancer,” she says. “I knew there had to be something else.”

She says she found out there is — namely a major drought of preventative efforts and a growing slew of carcinogens (substances that produce cancer) around us.

In one a dramatic scene in her documentary Mesley grills a top administrator at the Canadian Cancer Society on why they aren’t lobbying to have carcinogens removed from everyday products most people aren’t aware contain them.

“We went after the Canadian Cancer Society because it’s a story about setting priorities,” Mesley says. “The woman said to me, “We could probably get rid of two carcinogens, but what about the other 2000?”

“It’s just a cynical attitude. My generation may not be able to do anything for ourselves, but what about the next, or the one after that?” she says.

Since Chasing the Cancer Answer aired in March, Marketplace has received thousands of e-mails from people across the country thanking them.

The documentary ruffled a few feathers too.

In an open letter to Mesley, the Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada write, “…rather than being informed, Canadians were left misinformed by only a partial telling of the story.”

Mesley is unperturbed by such claims.

“People who say that we didn’t make our case didn’t do their homework,” she says. “The evidence is out there and, yes, it’s complicated.”

Mesley says her goal was to prod the right people to get some answers.

“We’re not told a lot about what causes cancer in things we encounter every day. Some people do know,” Mesley says. “Ideally, it’s the right to not be contaminated.”

Related Articles
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Barry Elson)

    Your article seems to support the jounalistic integrity of Mesley's Chasing the Cancer Answer "documentary" piece. In doing so you are compounding and abetting what appears to be more a wich-hunt than investigative journalism. You mention the blind-siding of the head of the Canadain Cancer Society as if iot were a good thing, and reporduce the errent assertion that the society has done nothing to combat the presence of known cancer-causing chemicals in our food. In fact, the society made recommnedations to governemtn to do just that, and the government has chosen to do nothing. The Canadian Cancer Society is a member of the National Committee on Environmental and Occupational Exposures, and made recommendations on a range of environment cancer-causing agents. If you want to do some real journalism,check some facts. See http://www.cancercontrol.org/cscc/pdf/BestProactiseReview.pdf
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Jack)

    I wish Wendy the best of luck and good health but her journalism style is nothing more than rage/trash.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Bruce Hill)

    My wife has breast cancer which was diagnosed in May 2005. She was also sort of a health nut and walked everyday. This cancer has spread to the bone and liver. She has undergone two separate terms of chemo and pills with no help from the Canadian Cancer Society at all.I always said it was in the food we eat and cleaning liquids. This article on Wendy Mesley just confirms my suspicions after studing it a bit and the fact that almost 85% of our food and pills come from China where it is not regulated for safety like it should be.Thanks for the article and the tv documentary
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Lisajames Garbo)

    I am also a "health nut" and got diagnosed with Stage 3 Inflammatory breast carcinoma. It never occured to me that I will get cancer. All the criteria for cancer, I don't have. My Mammogram was negative, and seven months later I got diagnosed with Stage 3 Inflammatory breast carcinoma. My brain got paralyzed from the shock!
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Lisa Boo)

    The government of Canada should ban all cleaning products and pesticides and fertilizers. I am a clean-freak person and vegetarian, however I got breast cancer.

    Is my breast cancer caused by the Mammogram radiation?
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Francis Fernandes)

    My friend has developed breast cancer which led me to research alternative therapies. I re-discovered laetrile, amygdalin, and apricot kernels. It seems that the AMA backed studies on laetrile were suspect at best, and the real reason laetrile was discredited was because the drug companies could not make a killing (pun intended) on it since they could not get a patent on an existing product.

    There is a lot of information available on the internet about the efficacy of such treatments, as well as the reasons why they work. It all makes sense.

    However, you cannot buy apricot kernels in Canada nor Vitamin B17 (derived from apricot kernels), nor laetrile or amygdalin.

    If our government goes through with Bill C51, we might end up requiring a prescription for Vitamin C. When is enough legislation enough? Does it ever enter their heads that they work for us and not the other way around?
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by MKC)

    Just after his 19 birthday, my boyfriend was diagnosed with Leukemia or blood cancer. He was told that he only had two months to live. After a persistent fight, in the third month he left us. It was one of the hardest things I have ever had to face in my life. There is no way to describe how painful and heartbreaking it is to have to loose someone that had so much potential, was so loving and was so high-spirited about life. He was an amazing person and a student at Ryerson who had nothing but dreams for his future. People need to open their eyes and look into what can be done to prevent situations like this from happening. If one in every two children will have to face cancer then why shouldn't we be concerned? You truly don't realize the impact that cancer has in our lives until we face it ourselves or with the people we love. Get serious about life and do your part in preventing even that one carcinogen. If we kill even one at a time out of those 2000 carcinogens, it will only help to save lives and hopefully one day bring the ratio of 1:2 down. If not for yourselves then do it for the future and those lost in the past. Rest In Peace Jai..we miss you with every passing day
     
Submit Comment


Article Options